株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Capital and Convict: Race, Region, and Punishment in Post-Civil War America.
商品詳細
Capital and Convict: Race, Region, and Punishment in Post-Civil War America. 南北戦争後のアメリカにおける人種、地域、刑罰
・ISBN 978-0-8139-4055-7 cloth US$ 52.00
¥12,183.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Kamerling, Henry, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | The American South Series |
| 出版社 | (U. Virginia Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2017 |
| ページ数 | 256 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <642-1219 642-L3136> |
解説
Both in the popular imagination and in academic discourse, North and South are presented as fundamentally divergent penal systems in the aftermath of the Civil War, a difference mapped onto larger perceived cultural disparities between the two regions. The South's post Civil War embrace of chain gangs and convict leasing occupies such a prominent position in the nation's imagination that it has come to represent one of the region's hallmark differences from the North. The regions are different, the argument goes, because they punish differently.
Capital and Convict challenges this assumption by offering a comparative study of Illinois's and South Carolina's formal state penal systems in the fifty years after the Civil War. Henry Kamerling argues that although punishment was racially inflected both during Reconstruction and after, shared, nonracial factors defined both states' penal systems throughout this period. The similarities in the lived experiences of inmates in both states suggest that the popular focus on the racial characteristics of southern punishment has shielded us from an examination of important underlying factors that prove just as central-if not more so-in shaping the realities of crime and punishment throughout the United States.
Capital and Convict challenges this assumption by offering a comparative study of Illinois's and South Carolina's formal state penal systems in the fifty years after the Civil War. Henry Kamerling argues that although punishment was racially inflected both during Reconstruction and after, shared, nonracial factors defined both states' penal systems throughout this period. The similarities in the lived experiences of inmates in both states suggest that the popular focus on the racial characteristics of southern punishment has shielded us from an examination of important underlying factors that prove just as central-if not more so-in shaping the realities of crime and punishment throughout the United States.