株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Interreligious Comparisons in Religious Studies and Theology: Comparison Revisited.
商品詳細
Interreligious Comparisons in Religious Studies and Theology: Comparison Revisited.
・ISBN 978-1-4742-8513-1 2016 hard GB£ 140.00
¥44,352.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
・ISBN 978-1-350-05872-9 2018 paper GB£ 35.99
¥11,401.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-4742-8516-2
| 著者・編者 | Schmidt-Leukel, Perry / Nehring, A. (eds.), |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Bloomsbury Academic, UK) |
| ページ数 | 240 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <641-L388 641-P781> |
解説
Can religions be compared? For decades the discipline of religious studies was based on the assumption that they can. Postmodern and postcolonial reflections, however, raised significant doubts. In social and cultural studies the investigation of the particular often took precedence over a comparative perspective. Interreligious Comparisons in Religious Studies and Theology questions whether religious studies can survive if it ceases to be comparative religion. Can it do justice to a globalized world if it is limited on the specific and turns a blind eye on the general?
While comparative approaches have come under strong pressure in religious studies, they have started flourishing in Theology. Comparative theology practices interfaith dialogue by means of comparative research. This volume asks whether theology and religious studies are able to mutually benefit from their critical and constructive reflections. Can postcolonial criticism of neutrality and objectivity in religious studies create new links with the decidedly perspectival approach of comparative theology?
In this collection scholars from theology and religious studies discuss the methodology of interreligious comparison in the light of recent doubts and current objections. Together with the contributors, Perry Schmidt-Leukel and Andreas Nehring argue that after decades of critique, interreligious comparison deserves to be reconsidered, reconstructed and reintroduced.