株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Civil Society and Financial Regulation : Consumer Finance Protection and Taxation after the Financial Crisis.

商品詳細

Civil Society and Financial Regulation

Civil Society and Financial Regulation : Consumer Finance Protection and Taxation after the Financial Crisis. 金融危機後の消費者金融保護と課税

・ISBN 978-1-138-63442-8 2018 hard GB£ 187.99

¥59,555.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

・ISBN 978-0-367-88720-9 2019 paper GB£ 46.99

¥14,886.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-315-20680-6

著者・編者Kastner, Lisa,
シリーズRIPE Series in Global Political Economy
出版社(Routledge, UK)
ページ数198 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<641-492 641-L577>

解説

Coalitions of consumer groups, NGOs, and trade unions have traditionally been considered politically weak compared to well-organized and resourceful financial sector groups which dominate or "capture" financial regulatory decisions. However, following the 2008 financial crisis, civil society groups have been seen to exert much more influence, with politicians successfully implementing financial reform in spite of industry opposition.

Drawing on literature from social movement research and regulatory politics, this book shows how diffuse interests were represented in financial regulatory overhauls in both the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). Four cases of reform in the post-crisis regulatory context are analyzed: the creation of a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in the US; the introduction of new consumer protection regulations through EU directives; the failure of attempts to introduce a financial transaction tax in the US; and the agreement of 11 EU member states to introduce such a tax. It shows how building coalitions with important elite allies outside and inside government helped traditionally weak interest groups transcend a lack of material resources to influence and shape regulatory policy.

By engaging with a less well-known side of the debate, it explains how business power was curbed and diverse interests translated into financial regulatory policy.