株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Interpreting Charles Taylor's Social Theory on Religion and Secularization : A Comparative Study.

商品詳細

Interpreting Charles Taylor's Social Theory on Religion and Secularization

Interpreting Charles Taylor's Social Theory on Religion and Secularization : A Comparative Study. 宗教と世俗化に関するC.テイラーの社会理論の解釈

・ISBN 978-3-319-47698-8 hard EUR 109.99

¥29,399.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者McKenzie, German,
シリーズSophia Studies in Cross-Cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures
出版社(Springer, GW)
出版年月2016
ページ数207 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<637-146 637-1909>

解説

This book examines "Taylorean social theory," its sources, main characteristics and impact. Charles Taylor's meta-narrative of secularization in the West, prominently contained in his major work A Secular Age (2007), has brought new insight on the social and cultural factors that intervened in such process, the role of human agency, and particularly on the contemporary conditions of belief in North America and Europe. This study discusses what Taylor's approach has brought to the scholarly debate on Western secularization, which has been carried on mostly in sociological terms. McKenzie interprets Taylor's views in a way that offers an original social theory. Such interpretation is possible with the help of sociologist Margaret Archer's "morphogenetic theory" and by making the most of Taylor's particular understanding of the method of the social sciences and of his philosophical views on human beings, knowledge and modernity. After exploring the philosophical and sociological sources informing Taylorean social theory and proposing its basic concepts and hermeneutic guidelines, the author compares it with two widespread theories of secularization: the now waning "orthodox" account and that proposed by Rational Choice Theory scholars, particularly prevalent in the United States. In doing so, the book shows in which ways Taylorean social theory supersedes them, what new issues it brings into the scholarly discussion, and what difficulties might limit its future development.