株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Africa's Social Cleavages and Democratization : Colonial, Postcolonial, and Multiparty Era.
商品詳細
Africa's Social Cleavages and Democratization : Colonial, Postcolonial, and Multiparty Era. アフリカの社会的亀裂と民主化 -植民地期、植民地後、多党時代-
・ISBN 978-1-4985-0019-7 cloth GB£ 119.00
¥37,699.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-6669-8501-6
| 著者・編者 | Kimemia, Douglas, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Lexington Books, US) |
| 出版年月 | 2015 |
| ページ数 | 396 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <637-1752 637-P2666> |
解説
Africa's Social Cleavages and Democratization offers a comparative approach to African countries by providing an in-depth analysis of the impact of ethnicity and religion on both multiparty and post-multiparty eras. By applying different theoretical frameworks, Douglas Kimemia explores and analyzes how social cleavages have affected the growth of democracy in Africa.
It is crucial to assess the relationship between democratic development and the impact of social cleavages, because multiparty politics have increased political competition, participation, transparency, and civic engagement in Africa. However, social divisions have significantly slowed the maturing of democracy, as these social cleavages have become polarizing factors, which are used by political elites for their own self-interest. As a result, politics of identity caused by competition of natural resources have led to increased conflicts and political instability in Africa. The social cleavages have also led to polarized party systems and caused adverse effects on democracy due to the highly polarized societies and political competition.
Despite the many positive impacts, multiparty politics have increased the consciousness of ethnic and religious identities, leading to unhealthy political competition as evidenced by highly fragmented societies prone to conflicts and violence. Kimemia comprehensively examines different governing, electoral, and party systems in order to determine the different incentives and how social divisions shape them. This analysis helps to distinguish more permanent political structures from the merely epiphenomenal within the African political scene.