株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧British and American Foundings of Parliamentary Science: 1775 - 1801.

商品詳細

British and American Foundings of Parliamentary Science: 1775 - 1801.

British and American Foundings of Parliamentary Science: 1775 - 1801. 英国から借用した米国の議会運営手続体制の樹立 1775~1801年

・ISBN 978-1-4724-7265-6 2017 hard GB£ 171.99

¥54,486.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

・ISBN 978-0-367-88152-8 2019 paper GB£ 47.99

¥15,203.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-315-57005-1

著者・編者Aschenbrenner, Peter J.,
シリーズInternational Relations and the European Atlantic World, 1660 - 1830
出版社(Routledge, UK)
ページ数180 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<636-3059 636-P6010>

解説

Upon declaring independence from Britain in July 1776, the United States Congress urgently needed to establish its credentials as a legitimate government that could credibly challenge the claims of the British Crown. In large measure this legitimacy rested upon setting in place the procedural and legal structures upon which all claims of governmental authority rest. In this book, Aschenbrenner explores the ways in which the nascent United States rapidly built up a system of parliamentary procedure that borrowed heavily from the British government it sought to replace. In particular, he looks at how, over the course of twenty-five years, Thomas Jefferson drew upon the writings of the Chief Clerk of the British Parliament, John Hatsell, to frame and codify American parliamentary procedures. Published in 1801, Jefferson's Manual of Parliamentary Practice for the Use of the Senate of the United States presents rules, instances, citations and commentary as modern readers would expect them to appear, quoting Hatsell and other British authorities numerous times. If the two nations suffered any unpleasant relations in the First War for American Independence - Aschenbrenner concludes - one would be hard pressed to detect it from Jefferson's Manual. Indeed, direct comparison of the House of Commons and the Continental Congress shows remarkable similarities between the ambitions of the two institutions as they both struggled to adapt their political processes to meet the changing national and international circumstances of the late-eighteenth century.