株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Proportionality and Judicial Activism : Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa.
商品詳細
Proportionality and Judicial Activism : Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa. 均衡性と司法積極主義－カナダ、ドイツ、 南アフリカにおける基本権の司法判断－
・ISBN 978-1-107-17798-7 hard GB£ 109.00
￥34,531.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
・ISBN 978-1-316-63082-2 paper GB£ 34.00
￥10,771.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック（eBook）ISBN 978-1-316-82333-0
| 著者・編者 | Petersen, Niels, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Cambridge U. Pr., UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2017 |
| ページ数 | 258 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜636-1228 636-L1083＞ |
解説
The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism.