株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Royal Favouritism and the Governing Elite of the Spanish Monarchy, 1640 - 1665.
商品詳細
Royal Favouritism and the Governing Elite of the Spanish Monarchy, 1640 - 1665. 王のひいきとスペイン王国の統治エリート 1640~65年
・ISBN 978-0-19-879190-4 2017 hard GB£ 117.50
¥37,224.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-183415-8
| 著者・編者 | Malcolm, Alistair, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Oxford Historical Monographs |
| 出版社 | (Oxford U. Pr., UK) |
| ページ数 | 320 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <634-3090 634-P5544> |
解説
Royal Favouritism and the Governing Elite of the Spanish Monarchy, 1640-1665 presents a study of the later years of the reign of Philip IV from the perspective of his favourite (valido), don Luis Mendez de Haro, and of the other ministers who helped govern the Spanish Habsburg Monarchy. It offers a positive vision of a period that is often seen as one of failure and decline. Unlike his predecessors, Haro exercised the favour that he enjoyed in a discreet way, acting as a perfect courtier and honest broker between the king and his aristocratic subjects. Nevertheless, Alistair Malcolm also argues that the presence of a royal favourite at the head of the government of Spain amounted to a major problem. The king's delegation of his authority to a single nobleman was considered by many to have been incompatible with good kingship, and Philip IV was himself very uneasy about failing in his responsibilities as a ruler. Haro was thus in a highly insecure situation, and sought to justify his regime by organizing the management of a prestigious and expensive foreign policy. In this context, the eventual conclusion of the very honourable peace with France in 1659 is shown to have been as much the result of the independent actions of other ministers as it was of a royal favourite very reluctantly brought to the negotiating table at the Pyrenees. By conclusion, the quite sudden collapse of Spanish European hegemony after Haro's death in 1661 is represented as a delayed reaction to the repercussions of a flawed system of government.