株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Civic Engagement in Food System Governance : A Comparative Perspective of American and British Local Food Movements.
商品詳細
Civic Engagement in Food System Governance : A Comparative Perspective of American and British Local Food Movements. 食料制度のガバナンスにおける市民参加 -英米の地産地消運動の比較的視点-
・ISBN 978-1-138-88843-2 2015 hard GB£ 171.99
¥54,486.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
・ISBN 978-1-138-49700-9 2018 paper GB£ 53.99
¥17,103.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-315-71343-4
| 著者・編者 | Hunt, Alan R., |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Routledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment |
| 出版社 | (Routledge, UK) |
| ページ数 | 292 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <627-599> |
解説
The local food movement is one of the most active of current civil engagement social movements. This work presents primary evidence from over 900 documents, interviews, and participant observations, and provides the first descriptive history of local food movement national policy achievements in the US, from 1976 to 2013, and in the UK, from 1991 to 2013, together with reviews of both the American and British local food movements. It provides a US-UK comparative context, significantly updating earlier comparisons of American, British and European farm and rural policies.
The comparative perspective shows that, over time, more effective strategies for national policy change required social-movement building strategies, such as collaborative policy coalitions, capacity-building for smaller organizations, and policy entrepreneurship for joining together separate rural, farming, food, and health interests. In contrast, narrowly-defined single issue campaigns often undermined long-term policy change, even if short-term wins emerged. By profiling interviews of American and English movement leaders, policymakers, and funders, the book demonstrates that democratic participation in food policy is best supported when funders incentivize groups to work together and overcome their differences.