株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Women's Irony : Rewriting Feminist Rhetorical Histories.
商品詳細
Women's Irony : Rewriting Feminist Rhetorical Histories.
・ISBN 978-0-8093-3418-6 paper US$ 45.00
￥10,543.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Graban, Tarez Samra, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Studies in Rhetorics and Feminisms |
| 出版社 | (Southern Illinois U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2015 |
| ページ数 | 256 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜625-L1422＞ |
解説
In Women's Irony: Rewriting Feminist Rhetorical Histories, author Tarez Samra Graban synthesizes three decades of scholarship in rhetoric, linguistics, and philosophy to present irony as a critical model for feminist rhetorical historiography that is not linked to humor, lying, or intention. Using irony as a form of ideological disruption, this innovative approach allows scholars to challenge simplistic narratives of who harmed, and who was harmed throughout rhetorical history.
Three case studies of women's political discourse between 1600 and 1900-examining the work of Anne Askew, Anne Hutchinson, and Helen M. Gougar-demonstrate how reading historical texts ironically complicates the theoretical relationships between women and agency, language and history, and archival location and memory. Interwoven throughout are shorter case studies from twentieth-century performances, revealing irony's consciousness-raising potential for the present and future. Together, these case studies suggest fresh ways to question women's histories and consider how contemporary feminist discourse might be better historicized. Graban urges scholars to re-examine the methods, theories, and practices used in their work as historiographers and rethink how historical knowledge is produced and how archives are used to recover women's political performances.
Ultimately Women's Irony suggests alternative ways to question women's histories and consider how contemporary feminist discourse might be better historicized. Graban challenges critical methods in rhetoric, asking scholars in rhetoric and its related disciplines-composition, communication, and English studies-to rethink how they produce historical knowledge and use archives to recover women's performances in political situations.
Three case studies of women's political discourse between 1600 and 1900-examining the work of Anne Askew, Anne Hutchinson, and Helen M. Gougar-demonstrate how reading historical texts ironically complicates the theoretical relationships between women and agency, language and history, and archival location and memory. Interwoven throughout are shorter case studies from twentieth-century performances, revealing irony's consciousness-raising potential for the present and future. Together, these case studies suggest fresh ways to question women's histories and consider how contemporary feminist discourse might be better historicized. Graban urges scholars to re-examine the methods, theories, and practices used in their work as historiographers and rethink how historical knowledge is produced and how archives are used to recover women's political performances.
Ultimately Women's Irony suggests alternative ways to question women's histories and consider how contemporary feminist discourse might be better historicized. Graban challenges critical methods in rhetoric, asking scholars in rhetoric and its related disciplines-composition, communication, and English studies-to rethink how they produce historical knowledge and use archives to recover women's performances in political situations.