株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Franz Boas as Public Intellectual. Volume 1 : Theory, Ethnography, Activism.
商品詳細
Franz Boas as Public Intellectual. Volume 1 : Theory, Ethnography, Activism. 知識人としてのF.ボアズ 第1巻：理論、民族誌、アクティヴィズム
・ISBN 978-0-8032-6984-2 cloth US$ 75.00
￥17,572.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Darnell, Regna / Hamilton, M. / Hancock, R. L. A. et al. (eds.), |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | The Franz Boas Papers: Documentary Edition |
| 出版社 | (U. Nebraska Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2015 |
| ページ数 | 408 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜624-2634＞ |
解説
This inaugural volume of The Franz Boas Papers Documentary Edition series presents current scholarship from the various academic disciplines that were shaped and continue to be influenced by Franz Boas (1858-1942). Few of Boas's intellectual progeny span the range of his disciplinary and public engagements. In his later career, Boas moved beyond Native American studies to become a public intellectual and advocate for social justice, particularly with reference to racism against African Americans and Jews and discrimination against women in science. He was a passionate defender of academic freedom, rigorous scholarship, and anthropology as a humane calling.
The Franz Boas Papers, Volume 1 examines Boas's stature as a public intellectual in three crucial dimensions: theory, ethnography, and activism. The volume's contributors move across many of the disciplines within which Boas himself worked, bringing to bear their expertise in Native studies, anthropology, history, linguistics, folklore, ethnomusicology, museum studies, comparative literature, English, film studies, philosophy, and journalism. This volume demonstrates a contemporary urgency to reassessing Boas both within the field of anthropology and beyond.
The Franz Boas Papers, Volume 1 examines Boas's stature as a public intellectual in three crucial dimensions: theory, ethnography, and activism. The volume's contributors move across many of the disciplines within which Boas himself worked, bringing to bear their expertise in Native studies, anthropology, history, linguistics, folklore, ethnomusicology, museum studies, comparative literature, English, film studies, philosophy, and journalism. This volume demonstrates a contemporary urgency to reassessing Boas both within the field of anthropology and beyond.