株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims.
商品詳細
Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims.
・ISBN 978-3-319-11399-9 hard EUR 49.99
¥13,361.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Gethmann, C. F. / Carrier, M. / Hanekamp, G. et al., |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment |
| 出版社 | (Springer, GW) |
| 出版年月 | 2014 |
| ページ数 | xvi, 195 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <620-L73> |
解説
Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts.
The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.