株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Bankrupts and Usurers of Imperial Russia : Debt, Property, and the Law in the Age of Dostoevsky and Tolstoy.
商品詳細
Bankrupts and Usurers of Imperial Russia : Debt, Property, and the Law in the Age of Dostoevsky and Tolstoy. 帝政ロシアの破産者と高利貸し
・ISBN 978-0-674-97148-6 cloth US$ 57.00
¥13,355.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Antonov, Sergei, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Harvard Historical Studies |
| 出版社 | (Harvard U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2016 |
| ページ数 | 385 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <633-P1485 633-P5374> |
解説
As readers of classic Russian literature know, the nineteenth century was a time of pervasive financial anxiety. With incomes erratic and banks inadequate, Russians of all social castes were deeply enmeshed in networks of credit and debt. The necessity of borrowing and lending shaped perceptions of material and moral worth, as well as notions of social respectability and personal responsibility. Credit and debt were defining features of imperial Russia's culture of property ownership. Sergei Antonov recreates this vanished world of borrowers, bankrupts, lenders, and loan sharks in imperial Russia from the reign of Nicholas I to the period of great social and political reforms of the 1860s.
Poring over a trove of previously unexamined records, Antonov gleans insights into the experiences of ordinary Russians, rich and poor, and shows how Russia's informal but sprawling credit system helped cement connections among property owners across socioeconomic lines. Individuals of varying rank and wealth commonly borrowed from one another. Without a firm legal basis for formalizing debt relationships, obtaining a loan often hinged on subjective perceptions of trustworthiness and reputation. Even after joint-stock banks appeared in Russia in the 1860s, credit continued to operate through vast networks linked by word of mouth, as well as ties of kinship and community. Disputes over debt were common, and Bankrupts and Usurers of Imperial Russia offers close readings of legal cases to argue that Russian courts-usually thought to be underdeveloped in this era-provided an effective forum for defining and protecting private property interests.