株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Islamic Thought in China : Sino-Muslim Intellectual Evolution from the 17th to the 21st Century.
商品詳細
Islamic Thought in China : Sino-Muslim Intellectual Evolution from the 17th to the 21st Century. 中国におけるイスラーム思想 －中国のムスリム知識人の展開 17～21世紀－
・ISBN 978-1-4744-0227-9 2016 hard GB£ 115.00
￥36,432.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
・ISBN 978-1-4744-2645-9 2017 paper GB£ 31.00
￥9,820.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック（eBook）ISBN 978-1-4744-0228-6
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック（eBook）ISBN 978-1-4744-2246-8
| 著者・編者 | Lipman, Jonathan (ed.), |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Edinburgh U. Pr., UK) |
| ページ数 | 288 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜631-2055＞ |
解説
How can people belong simultaneously to two cultures, originating in two different places and expressed in two different languages, without alienating themselves from either? Muslims have lived in the Chinese culture area for 1400 years, and the intellectuals among them have long wrestled with this problem. Unlike Persian, Turkish, Urdu, or Malay, the Chinese language never adopted vocabulary from Arabic to enable a precise understanding of Islam's religious and philosophical foundations. Islam thus had to be translated into Chinese, which lacks words and arguments to justify monotheism, exclusivity, and other features of this Middle Eastern religion. Even in the 21st century, Muslims who are culturally Chinese must still justify their devotion to a single God, avoidance of pork, and their communities' distinctiveness, among other things, to sceptical non-Muslim neighbours and an increasingly intrusive state. ?? The essays in this collection narrate the continuing translations and adaptations of Islam and Muslims in Chinese culture and society through the writings of Sino-Muslim intellectuals. Progressing chronologically and interlocking thematically, they help the reader develop a coherent understanding of the intellectual issues at stake.