株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > American Conservatism : NOMOS LVI.
商品詳細
American Conservatism : NOMOS LVI. アメリカの保守主義
・ISBN 978-1-4798-1237-0 cloth US$ 72.00
¥16,869.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-4798-5269-7
| 著者・編者 | Levinson, Sanford V. / Parker, J. / Williams, M. S., |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | NOMOS: Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy |
| 出版社 | (New York U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2016 |
| ページ数 | 448 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <631-1762> |
解説
A collection of essays that unpacks the history, nature, development, and beliefs of American Conservatism
The topic of American conservatism is especially timely-and perhaps volatile. Is there what might be termed an "exceptional" form of conservatism that is characteristically American, in contrast to conservatisms found in other countries? Are views that are identified in the United States as conservative necessarily congruent with what political theorists might classify under that label? Or does much American conservatism almost necessarily reflect the distinctly liberal background of American political thought?
In American Conservatism, a distinguished group of American political and legal scholars reflect on these crucial questions, unpacking the very nature and development of American conservative thought. They examine both the historical and contemporary realities of arguments offered by self-conscious conservatives in the United States, offering a well-rounded view of the state of this field. In addition to synoptic overviews of the various dimensions of American conservative thought, specific attention is paid to such topics as American constitutionalism, the role of religion and religious institutions, and the particular impact of the late Leo Strauss on American thought and thinkers. Just as American conservatism includes a wide, and sometimes conflicting, group of thinkers, the essays in this volume themselves reflect differing and sometimes controversial assessments of the theorists under discussion.