株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > The Iron Cage of Liberalism : International Politics and Unarmed Revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa.
商品詳細
The Iron Cage of Liberalism : International Politics and Unarmed Revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa. 自由主義の鳥かご -中東・北アフリカにおける国際政治と非武装革命-
・ISBN 978-0-19-965832-9 2014 hard GB£ 115.00
¥36,432.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-175596-5
| 著者・編者 | Ritter, Daniel, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Oxford U. Pr., UK) |
| ページ数 | 288 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <616-2044 616-L674> |
解説
Over the last forty years the world has witnessed the emergence and proliferation of a new political phenomenon - unarmed revolution. On virtually every continent, citizens have ousted their authoritarian leaders by employing nonviolent tactics such as strikes, demonstrations, boycotts, and civil disobedience against them. At the same time however, similar movements elsewhere have been brutally crushed by autocrats determined to cling to power. In this book, Daniel Ritter seeks to understand unarmed revolutions by posing two interrelated questions: Why do nonviolent revolutionary movements in some countries topples autocratic regimes while similar movements elsewhere falter, and why has the world witnessed the proliferation of unarmed revolutions in the last forty years? Through a comparative historical analysis of the Iranian, Tunisian, and Egyptian revolutions, he argues that close and friendly international relations between democratic states in the West and authoritarian regimes elsewhere constitute a plausible explanation for nonviolent revolutionary success. In an original conceptualization of revolutionary dynamics, Ritter argues that Western-aligned autocrats eventually find themselves restrained by their strong links to the democratic world through a mechanism he refers to as 'the iron cage of liberalism.' Having committed rhetorically to the West's fundamental political discourse of democracy and human rights, the dictators in Tehran, Tunis, and Cairo found themselves paralyzed when nonviolent crowds challenged them with tactics and demands fully compatible with the political ideals the regimes claimed as their own.