株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Citizenship in Cold War America : The National Security State and the Possibilities of Dissent.

商品詳細

Citizenship in Cold War America

Citizenship in Cold War America : The National Security State and the Possibilities of Dissent. 冷戦期アメリカにおける市民権 -安全保障国家と異議申立の可能性-

・ISBN 978-1-62534-067-2 cloth

絶版

お気に入り

・ISBN 978-1-62534-068-9 paper US$ 32.95

¥7,719.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Friedman, Andrea,
シリーズCulture, Politics, and the Cold War
出版社(U. Massachusetts Pr., US)
出版年月2014
ページ数288 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<613-3410>

解説

In the wake of 9/11, many Americans have deplored the dangers to liberty posed by a growing surveillance state. In this book, Andrea Friedman moves beyond the standard security/liberty dichotomy, weaving together often forgotten episodes of early Cold War history to reveal how the obsession with national security enabled dissent and fostered new imaginings of democracy. The stories told here capture a wide-ranging debate about the workings of the national security state and the meaning of American citizenship. Some of the participants in this debate - women like war bride Ellen Knauff and Pentagon employee Annie Lee Moss - were able to make their own experiences compelling examples of the threats posed by the national security regime. Others, such as Ruth Reynolds and Lolita Lebron, who advocated an end to American empire in Puerto Rico, or the psychiatrist Fredric Wertham, who sought to change the very definition of national security, were less successful. Together, however, they exposed the gap between democratic ideals and government policies. Friedman traverses immigration law and loyalty boards, popular culture and theoretical treatises, U.S. courtrooms and Puerto Rican jails, to demonstrate how Cold War repression made visible in new ways the unevenness and limitations of American citizenship. Highlighting the ways that race and gender shaped critiques and defences of the national security regime, she offers new insight into the contradictions of Cold War political culture.