株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Hardhats, Hippies, and Hawks : The Vietnam Antiwar Movement as Myth and Memory.
商品詳細
Hardhats, Hippies, and Hawks : The Vietnam Antiwar Movement as Myth and Memory. 伝説と記憶としてのベトナム反戦運動-階級を跨いだ視点
・ISBN 978-0-8014-5174-4 cloth US$ 145.00
¥33,973.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
・ISBN 978-0-8014-7856-7 paper US$ 35.95
¥8,422.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Lewis, Penny, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (ILR Pr. / Cornell U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2013 |
| ページ数 | 240 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <603-3148> |
解説
In the popular imagination, opposition to the Vietnam War was driven largely by college students and elite intellectuals, while supposedly reactionary blue-collar workers largely supported the war effort. In Hardhats, Hippies, and Hawks, Penny Lewis challenges this collective memory of class polarization. Through close readings of archival documents, popular culture, and media accounts at the time, she offers a more accurate "counter-memory" of a diverse, cross-class opposition to the war in Southeast Asia that included the labor movement, working-class students, soldiers and veterans, and Black Power, civil rights, and Chicano activists.
Lewis investigates why the image of antiwar class division gained such traction at the time and has maintained such a hold on popular memory since. Identifying the primarily middle-class culture of the early antiwar movement, she traces how the class interests of its first organizers were reflected in its subsequent forms. The founding narratives of class-based political behavior, Lewis shows, were amplified in the late 1960s and early 1970s because the working class, in particular, lacked a voice in the public sphere, a problem that only increased in the subsequent period, even as working-class opposition to the war grew. By exposing as false the popular image of conservative workers and liberal elites separated by an unbridgeable gulf, Lewis suggests that shared political attitudes and actions are, in fact, possible between these two groups.