株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Contract Law and Contract Practice : Bridging the Gap between Legal Reasoning and Commercial Expectation.

商品詳細

Contract Law and Contract Practice

Contract Law and Contract Practice : Bridging the Gap between Legal Reasoning and Commercial Expectation. 契約法と契約の実務 -法的推論と取引上の予想の間の隔たりを埋める-

・ISBN 978-1-84946-121-4 hard GB£ 95.00

¥30,096.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-4725-6162-6

著者・編者Mitchell, Catherine,
出版社(Hart, UK)
出版年月2013
ページ数228 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<603-1361>

解説

An oft-repeated assertion within contract law scholarship and cases is that a good contract law (or a good commercial contract law) will meet the needs and expectations of commercial contractors. Despite the prevalence of this statement, relatively little attention has been paid to why this should be the aim of contract law, how these 'commercial expectations' are identified and given substance, and what precise legal techniques might be adopted by courts to support the practices and expectations of business people. This book explores these neglected issues within contract law. It examines the idea of commercial expectation, identifying what expectations commercial contractors may have about the law and their business relationships (using empirical studies of contracting behaviour), and assesses the extent to which current contract law reflects these expectations. It considers whether supporting commercial expectations is a justifiable aim of the law according to three well-established theoretical approaches to contractual obligations: rights-based explanations, efficiency-based (or economic) explanations and the relational contract critique of the classical law. It explores the specific challenges presented to contract law by modern commercial relationships and the ways in which the general rules of contract law could be designed and applied in order to meet these challenges. Ultimately the book seeks to move contract law beyond a simple dichotomy between contextualist and formalist legal reasoning, to a more nuanced and responsive legal approach to the regulation of commercial agreements.