株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Paying Our High Public Officials : Evaluating the Political Justifications of Top Wages in the Public Sector.
商品詳細
Paying Our High Public Officials : Evaluating the Political Justifications of Top Wages in the Public Sector.
・ISBN 978-0-415-65703-7 2013 hard GB£ 171.99
¥54,486.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
・ISBN 978-1-138-90174-2 2015 paper GB£ 43.99
¥13,935.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-203-07737-5
| 著者・編者 | Dekker, Teun J., |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Routledge Research in Public Administration and Public Policy |
| 出版社 | (Routledge, UK) |
| ページ数 | 224 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <598-L595> |
解説
In almost every liberal democratic society, an issue that is a topic of constant and passionate public discussion is how much that country's ministers, legislators, senior civil servants, and senior judges should be paid. Nor is this surprising; the issue has considerable voyeuristic appeal, particular democratic significance, and important ramifications for the functioning of the public sector as a whole. However, like most political debates, these discussions tend to be messy, fragmented, and full of unverified assertions and spurious appeals to populist sentiment. It is hardly surprising that those discussions rarely succeed in putting the matter to rest.
Paying Our High Public Officials examines the political discourse concerning this question in 17 liberal democracies (Canada, the United States, Mexico, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Poland, Italy, Hong Kong, Singapore, and New Zealand). Based on many hundreds of parliamentary debates, newspaper articles, speeches, as well as reports by think tanks and high commissions of state, the book identifies seven central arguments that occur in all these societies, translates them into the language of analytical philosophy, and then rigorously evaluates them. This approach contributes to a better understanding of this controversy and may result in better-justified and more legitimate conclusions concerning which policy to adopt.