株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Banished : Common Law and the Rhetoric of Social Exclusion in Early New England.
商品詳細
Banished : Common Law and the Rhetoric of Social Exclusion in Early New England. 追放-初期ニューイングランドにおける コモン・ローと社会的排除のレトリック-
・ISBN 978-0-8122-4427-4 cloth US$ 80.00
¥18,744.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Goodman, Nan, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (U. Pennsylvania Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2012 |
| ページ数 | 224 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <595-760> |
解説
A community is defined not only by inclusion but also by exclusion. Seventeenth-century New England Puritans, themselves exiled from one society, ruthlessly invoked the law of banishment from another: over time, hundreds of people were forcibly excluded from this developing but sparsely settled colony. Nan Goodman suggests that the methods of banishment rivaled-even overpowered-contractual and constitutional methods of inclusion as the means of defining people and place. The law and rhetoric that enacted the exclusion of certain parties, she contends, had the inverse effect of strengthening the connections and collective identity of those that remained.
Banished investigates the practices of social exclusion and its implications through the lens of the period's common law. For Goodman, common law is a site of negotiation where the concepts of community and territory are more fluid and elastic than has previously been assumed for Puritan society. Her legal history brings fresh insight to well-known as well as more obscure banishment cases, including those of Anne Hutchinson, Roger Williams, Thomas Morton, the Quakers, and the Indians banished to Deer Island during King Philip's War. Many of these cases were driven less by the religious violations that may have triggered them than by the establishment of rules for membership in a civil society. Law provided a language for the Puritans to know and say who they were-and who they were not. Banished reveals the Puritans' previously neglected investment in the legal rhetoric that continues to shape our understanding of borders, boundaries, and social exclusion.