株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Talk at the Brink : Deliberation and Decision during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

商品詳細

Talk at the Brink

Talk at the Brink : Deliberation and Decision during the Cuban Missile Crisis. 瀬戸際の会談-キューバ・ミサイル危機における討議と決定

・ISBN 978-0-691-15131-1 cloth US$ 55.00

¥12,886.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-4008-4243-8

※この電子ブックは「電子ブックを探す(KPESS)」の価格表にまだ収録されていないため、価格は「お問い合わせ」からご確認ください。

著者・編者Gibson, David R.,
出版社(Princeton U. Pr., US)
出版年月2012
ページ数256 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<591-1931 591-L260>

解説

In October 1962, the fate of the world hung on the American response to the discovery of Soviet nuclear missile sites in Cuba. That response was informed by hours of discussions between John F. Kennedy and his top advisers. What those advisers did not know was that President Kennedy was secretly taping their talks, providing future scholars with a rare inside look at high-level political deliberation in a moment of crisis. Talk at the Brink is the first book to examine these historic audio recordings from a sociological perspective. It reveals how conversational practices and dynamics shaped Kennedy's perception of the options available to him, thereby influencing his decisions and ultimately the outcome of the crisis. David Gibson looks not just at the positions taken by Kennedy and his advisers but how those positions were articulated, challenged, revised, and sometimes ignored. He argues that Kennedy's decisions arose from the intersection of distant events unfolding in Cuba, Moscow, and the high seas with the immediate conversational minutia of turn-taking, storytelling, argument, and justification. In particular, Gibson shows how Kennedy's group told and retold particular stories again and again, sometimes settling upon a course of action only after the most frightening consequences were omitted or actively suppressed. Talk at the Brink presents an image of Kennedy's response to the Cuban missile crisis that is sharply at odds with previous scholarship, and has important implications for our understanding of decision making, deliberation, social interaction, and historical contingency.