株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Adapt, Fragment, Transform : Corporate Restructuring and System Reform in Korea.
商品詳細
Adapt, Fragment, Transform : Corporate Restructuring and System Reform in Korea. 韓国の企業再構築とシステム改革
・ISBN 978-1-931368-21-6 paper US$ 28.95
￥6,782.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Kim, Byung-Kook / Kim, Eun Mee / Oi, J. C. (eds.), |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford Univ., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2012 |
| ページ数 | 360 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜577-352 577-L398＞ |
解説
South Korea remains a puzzle for political economists. The country has experienced phenomenal economic growth since the 1960s, but its upward trajectory has been repeatedly diverted by serious systemic crises, followed by spectacular recoveries. The recoveries are often the result of vigorous structural reforms that nonetheless retain many of South Korea's traditional economic institutions.
How, then, can South Korea suffer from persistent systemic instability and yet prove so resilient? What remains the same and what changes? The contributors to this volume consider the South Korean economy in its larger political context. Moving beyond the easy dichotomies -equilibrium vs. disequilibrium and stability vs. instability -they describe a complex and surprisingly robust economic and political system.
Further, they argue that neither systemic challenges nor political pressures alone determine South Korea's stability and capacity for change. Instead, it is distinct patterns of interaction that shape this system's characteristics, development, and evolution.
How, then, can South Korea suffer from persistent systemic instability and yet prove so resilient? What remains the same and what changes? The contributors to this volume consider the South Korean economy in its larger political context. Moving beyond the easy dichotomies -equilibrium vs. disequilibrium and stability vs. instability -they describe a complex and surprisingly robust economic and political system.
Further, they argue that neither systemic challenges nor political pressures alone determine South Korea's stability and capacity for change. Instead, it is distinct patterns of interaction that shape this system's characteristics, development, and evolution.