株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Why Iowa? : How Caucuses and Sequential Elections Improve the Presidential Nominating Process.
商品詳細
Why Iowa? : How Caucuses and Sequential Elections Improve the Presidential Nominating Process. いかに党員大会と一連の選挙が 大統領候補指名過程を改善するか
・ISBN 978-0-226-70695-5 cloth US$ 105.00
¥24,601.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
・ISBN 978-0-226-70696-2 paper US$ 37.00
¥8,669.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Redlawsk, David P. / Tolbert, C. J. / Donovan, T., |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (U. Chicago Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2011 |
| ページ数 | 314 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <577-1340 601-1212> |
解説
If Barack Obama had not won in Iowa, most commentators believe that he would not have been able to go on to capture the Democratic nomination for president. "Why Iowa?" offers the definitive account of those early weeks of the campaign season: from how the Iowa caucuses work and what motivates the candidates' campaigns, to participation and turnout, as well as the lingering effects that the campaigning had on Iowa voters. Demonstrating how 'what happens in Iowa' truly reverberates throughout the country, five-time Iowa precinct caucus chair David P. Redlawsk and his coauthors take us on an inside tour of one of the most media-saturated and speculated-about campaign events in American politics. Considering whether a sequential primary system, in which early, smaller states such as Iowa and New Hampshire have such a tremendous impact, is fair or beneficial to the country as a whole, the authors here demonstrate that not only is the impact warranted, but it also reveals a great deal about informational elements of the campaigns. Contrary to conventional wisdom, this sequential system does confer huge benefits on the nominating process, while Iowa's particularly well-designed caucus system - extensively explored here for the first time - brings candidates' arguments, strengths, and weaknesses into the open and under the media's lens.