株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Our Biometric Future : Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance.
商品詳細
Our Biometric Future : Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance. 顔認識技術と監視の文化
・ISBN 978-0-8147-3209-0 cloth US$ 85.00
¥19,915.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
・ISBN 978-0-8147-3210-6 paper US$ 36.00
¥8,434.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-8147-3303-5
| 著者・編者 | Gates, Kelly A., |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Critical Cultural Communication |
| 出版社 | (New York U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2011 |
| ページ数 | 274 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <576-1942> |
解説
Since the 1960s, a significant effort has been underway to program computers to "see" the human face—to develop automated systems for identifying faces and distinguishing them from one another-commonly known as Facial Recognition Technology. While computer scientists are developing FRT in order to design more intelligent and interactive machines, businesses and states agencies view the technology as uniquely suited for "smart" surveillance-systems that automate the labor of monitoring in order to increase their efficacy and spread their reach.
Tracking this technological pursuit, Our Biometric Future identifies FRT as a prime example of the failed technocratic approach to governance, where new technologies are pursued as shortsighted solutions to complex social problems. Culling news stories, press releases, policy statements, PR kits and other materials, Kelly Gates provides evidence that, instead of providing more security for more people, the pursuit of FRT is being driven by the priorities of corporations, law enforcement and state security agencies, all convinced of the technology's necessity and unhindered by its complicated and potentially destructive social consequences. By focusing on the politics of developing and deploying these technologies, Our Biometric Future argues not for the inevitability of a particular technological future, but for its profound contingency and contestability.