株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Rectifying International Injustice : Principles of Compensation and Restitution between Nations.
商品詳細
Rectifying International Injustice : Principles of Compensation and Restitution between Nations. 国際的不正の修正-国家間の補償と原状回復の原則
・ISBN 978-0-19-921824-0 hard GB£ 150.00
¥47,520.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-171158-9
| 著者・編者 | Butt, Daniel, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Oxford U. Pr., UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2008 |
| ページ数 | 228 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <553-825 553-976> |
解説
The history of international relations is characterized by widespread injustice. What implications does this have for those living in the present? Many writers have dismissed the moral urgency of rectificatory justice in a domestic context, as a result of their forward-looking accounts of distributive justice. Rectifying International Injustice argues that historical international injustice raises a series of distinct theoretical problems, as a result of the popularity of backward-looking accounts of distributive justice in an international context. It lays out three morally relevant forms of connection with the past, based in ideas of benefit, entitlement and responsibility. Those living in the present may have obligations to pay compensation to those in other states insofar as they are benefiting, and others are suffering, as a result of the effects of historic injustice. They may be in possession of property which does not rightly belong to them, but to which others have inherited entitlements. Finally, they may be members of political communities which bear collective responsibility for an ongoing failure to rectify historic injustice. Rectifying International Injustice considers each of these three linkages with the past in detail. It examines the complicated relationship between rectificatory justice and distributive justice, and argues that many of those who resist cosmopolitan demands for the global redistribution of resources have failed to appreciate the extent to which past wrongdoing undermines the legitimacy of contemporary resource holdings.