株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧The Tension Between Group Rights and Human Rights : A Multidisciplinary Approach.

商品詳細

The Tension Between Group Rights and Human Rights

The Tension Between Group Rights and Human Rights : A Multidisciplinary Approach. 集団の権利と人権の間の緊張-学際的アプローチ

・ISBN 978-1-84113-829-9 hard GB£ 100.00

¥31,680.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-4725-6444-3

著者・編者Feyter, Koen De / Pavlakos, G. (eds.),
シリーズHuman Rights in Perspective Series
出版社(Hart, UK)
出版年月2008
ページ数312 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<550-789>

解説

The discussion of group rights, while always a part of the human rights discourse, has been gaining importance in the past decade. This discussion, which remains fundamental to a full realisation by the international community of its international human rights goals, requires careful analysis and empirical research. The present volume offers a great deal of material for both. It makes a strong case in favour of a multidisciplinary approach to human rights and explores the origins and social, anthropological and legal/political dimensions of human rights and internationally recognised group rights. It explores legal issues such as the reservations to international treaties and methodological questions, including the question of deliberative processes which allow seemingly absolute requirements of human rights to be reconciled with culturally sensitive norms prevailing within various groups. The discussion continues by looking at specific contexts, including the situations of women, school communities, ethnic and linguistic minorities, migrant communities and impoverished groups. The final part of the volume examines the 'state of play' of human rights and group rights in international law, in international relations and in the context of internationally sponsored development policies. Here the authors offer a meticulous and critical presentation of the legal regulation of human rights and group rights and point to numerous weaknesses which continue to exist and which call for additional work by legal thinkers and practitioners.