株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Knowledge and Innovation : A Comparative Study of the USA, the UK, and Japan.

商品詳細

Knowledge and Innovation

Knowledge and Innovation : A Comparative Study of the USA, the UK, and Japan. 知識とイノベーション-米国・英国・日本の比較研究

・ISBN 978-0-415-41663-4 2008 hard GB£ 171.99

¥54,486.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

・ISBN 978-0-415-54158-9 2012 paper GB£ 50.99

¥16,153.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-429-24149-9

著者・編者Brown, Helen,
シリーズRoutledge Studies in Innovation, Organization and Technology
出版社(Routledge, UK)
ページ数220 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<543-417>

解説

This new book presents case studies from the US, the UK and Japan. Packed full of vignettes from cases studies and subscribing to a socio-cultural approach rather than the often tacit assumption that knowledge and 'technology transfer' is a logistical problem, this excellent volume illuminates the often misunderstood process of knowledge transfer.

Arguing that partnership between public and private sector organizations can take many forms, some of which are very complicated Brown shows that 'partnership' should not be prescribed as a panacea for the delivery of complex policy in education, health and economic regeneration. Instead policy makers need to adopt a much more subtle and sophisticated concept of multi-agency partnership that acknowledges the time and effort needed to build trust and new shared practices.

Taking issue with weak theories of change endemic in some policies and emphasizing the process of knowledge creation and the significance of consequent changes in the dynamics of human relations Brown conceptualizes innovation as collaboration between diverse organizations and individuals, the result of which is organizational learning.

This book will be of great interest to students and researchers interested in policy studies, business and management and education, as well as policy makers engaged with communities of practice theory.