株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > When Movements Matter : The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security.
商品詳細
When Movements Matter : The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security. タウンゼント計画と社会保障の起源
・ISBN 978-0-691-12473-5 2006 cloth US$ 38.50
¥9,020.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
・ISBN 978-0-691-13826-8 2008 paper US$ 41.00
¥9,606.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Amenta, Edwin, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Princeton Studies in American Politics: Historical, International, and Comparative Perspectives |
| 出版社 | (Princeton U. Pr., US) |
| ページ数 | 352 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <533-478> |
解説
"When Movements Matter" accounts for the origins of Social Security as we know it. The book tells the overlooked story of the Townsend Plan - a political organization that sought to alleviate poverty and end the Great Depression through a government-provided retirement stipend of $200 a month for every American over the age of sixty. Both the Townsend Plan, which organized two million older Americans into Townsend clubs, and the wider pension movement failed to win the generous and universal senior citizens' pensions their advocates demanded. But the movement provided the political impetus behind old-age policy in its formative years and pushed America down the track of creating an old-age welfare state. Drawing on a wealth of primary evidence, historical detail, and arresting images, Edwin Amenta traces the ups and downs of the Townsend Plan and its elderly leader Dr. Francis E. Townsend in the struggle to remake old age. In the process, Amenta advances a new theory of when social movements are influential. The book challenges the conventional wisdom that U.S. old-age policy was a result mainly of the Depression or farsighted bureaucrats. It also debunks the current view that America immediately embraced Social Security when it was adopted in 1935. And it sheds new light on how social movements that fail to achieve their primary goals can still influence social policy and the way people relate to politics.