株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Investment under Uncertainty, Coalition Spillovers and Market Evolution in a Game Theoretic Perspective.

商品詳細

Investment under Uncertainty, Coalition Spillovers and Market Evolution in a Game Theoretic Perspective.

Investment under Uncertainty, Coalition Spillovers and Market Evolution in a Game Theoretic Perspective. 不確実性下の投資、結託スピルオーバー、市場の進歩 -ゲーム理論的視点から-

・ISBN 978-1-4020-7877-4 hard EUR 149.99

¥40,091.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Thijssen, Jacco,
シリーズTheory and Decision Library. C: Game Theory, Mathematical Programming and Operations Research
出版社(Kluwer Academic, NE)
出版年月2004
ページ数250 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<510-146 510-L69>

解説

Both economists and popular writers have once more run away with some fragments of reality they happened to grasp. Joseph A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 1942. 1. Rational Behaviour and Economics Never in the history of mankind has there been such unlimited belief intheabilitiesofthehumanmindasintheAgeofReasoninthe?rsthalf of the eighteenth century. The likes of Mozart, Goethe, and Rousseau ensured a new era of optimism and creativity in both the arts and the sciences. In mathematics, the theory of probability was re?ned and its laws were believed to be good descriptions of human reasoning and 1 decision making. The French Revolution was the logical conclusion of theAgeofReasonandEnlightenment. Italsobroughtaboutitspolitical and social downfall, ending in an age of terror; a victim of its own success. In the early nineteenth century, however, most ?elds of science abandoned many ideas from the era of Enlightenment. Nevertheless, in psychology and economics the probabilistic approach to describing a human being as a fully rational homo economicus remained popular as ever. 1 In Rousseau (1762, p. 97), for example, one ?nds: "Calculateurs, c'est maintenant votre a? aire; comptez, mesurez, comparez". 1 2 INVESTMENT, COALITION SPILLOVERS, AND EVOLUTION Most of contemporary economics still uses the axiom of rational e- nomic agents, where agents are believed to maximise expected utility. Expectations are often assumed to be based on objective probabilities. Expected utility with objective probabilities has been axiomatised by Von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944).