株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Scientism : Science, Ethics and Religion.
商品詳細
Scientism : Science, Ethics and Religion. 科学主義-科学、倫理、宗教
・ISBN 978-0-7546-0445-7 hard GB£ 125.00
¥39,600.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
・ISBN 978-0-7546-0446-4 paper GB£ 25.00
¥7,920.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-315-24362-7
※この電子ブックは「電子ブックを探す(KPESS)」の価格表にまだ収録されていないため、価格は「お問い合わせ」からご確認ください。
| 著者・編者 | Stenmark, Mikael, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Ashgate Science and Religion |
| 出版社 | (Ashgate, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2001 |
| ページ数 | 256 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <476-145> |
解説
Can science tell us everything there is to know about reality? The intellectual and practical successes of science have led some scientists to think that there are no real limits to the competence of science, and no limits to what can be achieved in the name of science. Accordingly, science has no boundaries; it will eventually answer all our problems. This view (and similar views) have been called Scientism. In this important book scientists' views about science and its relationship to knowledge, ethics and religion are subjected to critical scrutiny. A number of distinguished natural scientists have advocated Scientism in one form or another - Francis Crick, Richard Dawkins, Carl Sagan, and Edward O. Wilson - and their impressive impact both inside and outside the sciences is considered. Clarifying what Scientism is, this book proceeds to evaluate its key claims, expounded in questions such as: Is it the case that science can tell us everything there is to know about reality? Can science tell us how we morally ought to live and what the meaning of life is? Can science in fact be our new religion? Ought we to become "science believers"? Stenmark addresses these and similar issues, concluding that Scientism is not really science but disguised materialism or naturalism; its advocates fail to see this, not being sufficiently aware that their arguments presuppose the previous acceptance of certain extra-scientific or philosophical beliefs.