株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧The Presidency and the Politics of Racial Inequality : Nation-Keeping from 1831 to 1965.

商品詳細

The Presidency and the Politics of Racial Inequality

The Presidency and the Politics of Racial Inequality : Nation-Keeping from 1831 to 1965. 大統領と人種不平等政策 1831~1965年

・ISBN 978-0-231-10722-8 cloth

お気に入り

・ISBN 978-0-231-10723-5 paper

お気に入り
著者・編者Riley, Russell L.,
シリーズPower, Conflict, and Democracy: American Politics into the Twenty-First Century
出版社(Columbia U. Pr., US)
出版年月1999
ページ数400 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<447-1445 447-L117>

解説

From the abolition of slavery to the civil rights movement one hundred years later, one of the primary characteristics of America's development as a nation has been the steady struggle for and expansion of the horizons of citizenship. Pivotal in any equal rights movement is the response of the White House: how the president addresses any such movement profoundly affects its chances for success. Russell L. Riley examines the logic of presidential behavior with regard to equality movements. Focusing on the most explosive and enduring of such movements--the struggle for social and economic parity by African Americans--Riley argues that the president's unwritten mandate as the designated protector of domestic social order is to suppress or moderate major social change. Consequently, only in extreme circumstances have presidents become advocates of serious reform. The Presidency and the Politics of Racial Inequality goes beyond the triad of Lincoln, Kennedy, and Johnson with discussions of F.D.R., Truman, and Eisenhower to see how these presidents dealt with situations that forced them into the fray. Riley questions the positive role played by some presidents--and contends that their failure to suppress racial unrest has not been adequately discussed.As Riley convincingly demonstrates, American political culture made it unlikely that any president would invest executive power in a deeply controversial enterprise. His study goes far toward explaining why significant change has been slow to take hold, even in one of the most open democratic systems in the world.