株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Women Workers and Technological Change in Europe in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.

商品詳細

Women Workers and Technological Change in Europe in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.

Women Workers and Technological Change in Europe in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. 19・20世紀欧州における女性労働者と技術変化

・ISBN 978-0-7484-0260-1 cloth GB£ 171.99

¥54,486.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

・ISBN 978-0-7484-0261-8 paper

絶版

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-203-99108-4

著者・編者Groot, G. de / M. Schrover (eds.),
出版社(Taylor & Francis, UK)
出版年月1995
ページ数214 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<424-1441>

解説

From the traditional stereotyped viewpoint, femininity and technology clash. This negative association between women and technology is one of the features of the sex-typing of jobs. Men are seen as technically competent and creative; women are seen as incompetent, suited only to work with machines that have been made and maintained by men. Men identify themselves with technology, and technology is identified with masculinity. The relationship between technology, technological change and women's work is, however, very complex.; Through studies examining technological change and the sexual division of labour, this book traces the origins of the segregation between women's work and men's work and sheds light on the complicated relationship between work and technology. Drawing on research from a number of European countries England, Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands, international contributors present detailed studies on women's work spanning two centuries. The chapters deal with a variety of work environments - office work, textiles and pottery, food production, civil service and cotton and wool industries.; This work rejects the idea that women were mainly employed as unskilled labour in the industrial revolutions, asserting that skill was required from the women, but that both the historical record about women's work and the social construction of the concept of "skill" have denied this.