株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Representation in Crisis. The Constitution, Interest Groups, and Political Parties.

商品詳細

Representation in Crisis. The Constitution, Interest Groups, and Political Parties.

Representation in Crisis. The Constitution, Interest Groups, and Political Parties. 危機における代議制-憲法,利益団体,政党

・ISBN 978-0-7914-3057-6 cloth US$ 104.00

¥24,367.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

・ISBN 978-0-7914-3058-3 paper US$ 38.95

¥9,125.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Ryden, D. K.,
シリーズSUNY Series in Political Party Development
出版社(State U. New York Pr., US)
出版年月1996
ページ数309 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<423-1048 425-1010>

解説

Details how the Supreme Court has impoverished the constitutional standing of political parties, thereby contributing to a crisis of representation.

Confronting a fundamentally important but often neglected reality in American politics, this book shows the powerful influence of the courts in determining the shape and operation of our politics. The author exhaustively details how the Supreme Court has impoverished the constitutional standing of political parties in areas of redistricting, campaign finance, ballot access, patronage, and party primaries, opting instead for superficially appealing notions of group-based representation.

Ryden demonstrates how the Supreme Court, by checking virtually everything undertaken by the more "political" branches, of government, has exerted powerful influence on how the political system operates and how politics plays out at the most practical level. The book details the Court's attraction to group-based approaches to representation currently in vogue and offers persuasive evidence that while well-intended,such approaches only feed the crisis of representation afflicting this country. These approaches, Ryden aruges, compartmentalize and separate out those being represented rather than cultivate a more unified, inclusive, and ultimately healthier scheme of representation. This compelling indictment of the Supreme Court's constitutional theory of representation offers a much-needed prescription for how the Court might better perform its role as ultimate guardian of representative government.